Arc

Publisher The Browser Company (Atlassian)
Last updated
Popularity
Deployment Posture
Consumer-First

Workflow-centric Chromium browser with innovative UX but no enterprise management model, now in maintenance mode with limited prospects for additional enterprise features.

Profile Overview

Public Description: Experience a calmer, more personal internet in this browser designed for you. Let go of the clicks, the clutter, the distractions with the Arc browser.

Website: arc.net

Archetype: Productivity

Primary Differentiator: Chromium-based browser with a sidebar-centric interface, Spaces, and built-in creative tools focused on organizing workflows rather than traditional tab management.

Arc began as a macOS-only browser from The Browser Company, opening to the public in 2022 with a focus on rethinking browser UX around a sidebar, Spaces, and built-in creative tools like Easels and Boosts. It later expanded to iOS and then to Windows, where a native WinUI-based client brought Arc's interface to Windows 11. In late 2024, The Browser Company announced it was shifting focus toward new AI-powered browser products, effectively placing Arc in maintenance mode with no planned major feature development.

Market Position

Arc targeted design- and workflow-focused individual users and small teams rather than enterprise deployments. It gained a visible but niche user base among macOS and creative professionals, with Windows support arriving later with partial feature parity. With the vendor's pivot away from Arc, its position is now that of a completed experiment in browser UX rather than an evolving product.

Technical Foundation

Arc is built on Chromium, using the Blink engine and inheriting Chromium's multi-process architecture, sandboxing, and web standards support. The vendor's security documentation states that Arc uses Google Cloud Firebase for user authentication and storage for Notes and Easels, with data encrypted at rest. Arc's signature features include Spaces for organizing groups of tabs and accounts, vertical sidebar navigation, split views, and rich theming.

Enterprise Adoption

Arc was never positioned as an enterprise browser and lacks the policy surface and management tooling expected in large organizations. Community reports indicate that some enterprises explicitly disallowed Arc because it did not support enterprise security management features available in mainstream browsers. The Browser Company published limited information on group policies, primarily plist-based settings on macOS, but there is no ADMX policy catalog or dedicated management console. Given the product's maintenance-mode status, these enterprise capabilities are unlikely to be expanded.

Deployment Posture

Specialized
Consumer-First
Enterprise-Tolerable
Enterprise-Native
2.0

Arc can be installed and lightly configured on managed devices, but the absence of a robust policy framework, limited documentation on enterprise controls, and the vendor's pivot away from Arc make it unsuitable as a primary enterprise browser.

Deployment Guidance

Arc does not ship with a dedicated enterprise deployment and management stack. It is installed and updated like a consumer application, with limited documentation on configuration for managed environments. On macOS, The Browser Company documents that Arc policies are stored in a property list (plist), and administrators can adjust settings by editing that file or deploying managed preferences. On Windows, Arc is delivered as a native WinUI application, and deployment relies on standard software distribution tools and built-in auto-update.

Deployment Options

Method Best For Key Features
Manual or MDM-based install on macOS Small teams with limited Arc usage Install from vendor site; manage basic settings via plist-based preferences
Software distribution on Windows Organizations permitting Arc as secondary browser Package installer and deploy to targeted devices; rely on auto-update
End-user installation BYOD or lightly managed environments Users install directly; IT relies on endpoint and network security tools

Update Channels

  • Stable builds with auto-update: Arc provides stable releases with integrated auto-update; no ESR-style channel or enterprise release track exists
  • Maintenance mode: With Arc's shift to maintenance status, updates focus on stability and security rather than new features

Extension Management

Arc runs Chrome-compatible extensions via Chromium's extension framework, but there is no enterprise extension governance guide. Governance typically relies on external controls (EDR, CASB, proxy filtering) rather than Arc-native extension policies.

Best Fit Scenarios

  • Small teams or departments using Arc for individual productivity and workflow organization on macOS or Windows, alongside a formally managed primary browser.
  • Design, product, or engineering groups experimenting with Spaces, split views, and creative tools to structure research and web-centric work without central policy requirements.
  • Organizations that allow Arc as an optional secondary browser for power users while enforcing stricter controls and compliance on a separate, enterprise-managed browser.

Caution Scenarios

  • Enterprises that require a documented enterprise policy catalog, ADMX templates, and a vendor-supported management plane comparable to mainstream enterprise browsers.
  • Environments with strict change control and long-term support expectations, given that The Browser Company has shifted focus away from Arc toward successor products.
  • Organizations that must meet formal compliance, audit, and data governance requirements using browser-native controls, given Arc's limited published information on enterprise logging, policy enforcement, and lifecycle support.
shield

Secure Arc in Your Enterprise

Keep Aware's lightweight browser extension provides real-time threat detection, data leakage prevention, and protection against evolving attacks that exploit human error.

Key Risks & Considerations

Arc's design emphasizes workflow organization and cloud-backed features such as Notes and Easels stored in Firebase, creating data flows beyond local browsing. The vendor states it does not log page content, history, or URLs in telemetry.

Security Architecture

Arc's security stance is anchored in its Chromium base and a Firebase/Google Cloud backend:

  • Chromium-based engine: Inherits sandboxing, process isolation, and the broader Chromium security ecosystem
  • Firebase-backed storage: User authentication and storage for Notes and Easels rely on Firebase with encryption at rest
  • Limited security documentation: No full hardening, policy, or incident response guide for enterprises

Privacy & Telemetry Considerations

Feature Data Sent Can Disable?
Authentication User identifiers stored in Firebase Intrinsic to account features
Notes and Easels User content stored in Firebase, encrypted at rest Users choose what to store; no enterprise policy surface
Browser telemetry Operational metrics; no URLs, history, or page content logged Limited configuration documentation

Vendor Dependency

Arc is produced by The Browser Company, an independent vendor without a large enterprise platform. The announced shift to maintenance mode and focus on new products means there is no public guarantee of extended support or enterprise commitments. Security architects should factor this uncertainty into any decision to allow Arc beyond experimental use cases.

Dimension Ratings

Quality assessments across nine standardized dimensions, scored 1-5 based on publicly available documentation and observed behavior. Learn more

Security

3 — Adequate
  • Arc inherits Chromium's security properties, including multi-process architecture, sandboxing, and use of the Blink engine for web content isolation.
  • Vendor security documentation indicates that Arc uses Google Cloud Firebase for authentication and storage with encryption at rest, while stating that it does not log URLs, page content, or history as telemetry.
  • Public discussion has highlighted security flaws related to Arc's cloud-backed features, and there is no dedicated enterprise security hardening guide comparable to major enterprise browsers.

Reliability

2 — Limited
  • Arc benefits from Chromium's proven rendering stack, and macOS and Windows builds have been available with ongoing maintenance updates.
  • Windows support launched later and has lagged macOS in feature parity.
  • The vendor's shift to maintenance mode introduces uncertainty about Arc's long-term update prioritization, affecting planning horizons in enterprise contexts.

Performance

4 — Strong
  • As a Chromium-based browser, Arc generally offers performance characteristics similar to other Blink-based browsers for typical web applications.
  • Arc's UX design emphasizes sidebars and Spaces rather than heavy theme engines or bundled extensions, keeping the base runtime close to Chromium performance.
  • Some advanced features (AI tools, live previews, multi-pane views) can increase resource usage on lower-spec devices.

Usability

4 — Strong
  • Arc introduces a sidebar-centric interface, Spaces, and tab lifecycle concepts (auto-archiving) that many users report as materially improving workflow organization.
  • The browser includes split view, profiles within Spaces, and integrated tools (Easels, Notes) that can reduce context switching for web-centric work.
  • These departures from conventional tabbed UI patterns create a learning curve, and some enterprise users may find Arc's interaction model unfamiliar.

Compatibility

4 — Strong
  • Blink-based rendering and Chromium foundations provide broad compatibility with modern web standards and most SaaS applications built for Chromium.
  • Arc supports multiple profiles and Spaces, enabling separate sign-ins to different accounts for multi-tenant workflows.
  • Windows support has lacked full feature parity with macOS, and there is no enterprise compatibility program for business applications.

Maintainability

1 — Absent
  • Arc can be installed and updated via standard OS mechanisms, and the vendor documents basic plist-based settings on macOS.
  • There is no publicly documented ADMX template set, MDM profile catalog, or centralized configuration reference for enterprises.
  • With Arc in maintenance mode, the limited enterprise management capabilities are unlikely to be expanded.

Portability

3 — Adequate
  • Arc is available on macOS, Windows, and iOS, with Android availability through Arc Search.
  • Feature parity is incomplete across platforms, with macOS ahead of Windows and mobile providing only partial browser capability.
  • There is no Linux or ChromeOS build, and enterprise management practices differ between macOS and Windows due to the lack of a standardized policy framework.

Functional Suitability

3 — Adequate
  • Arc supports core browsing needs: TLS, modern web APIs, and authentication to SaaS and internal web applications on top of Chromium's baseline capabilities.
  • Spaces, profiles, and workflow-centric features can be functionally useful for knowledge workers managing multiple accounts and projects.
  • Arc does not provide native enterprise capabilities such as policy-driven DLP, integrated identity controls, or compliance reporting.

Enterprise Readiness

1 — Absent
  • Arc's vendor has published limited information about configuration via macOS policies and has not released a comprehensive enterprise management toolkit.
  • Administrators have highlighted the lack of enterprise security management as a reason for restricting Arc in corporate environments.
  • The Browser Company's pivot away from Arc toward new products, combined with maintenance-mode status, means enterprise capabilities are effectively frozen.

Publisher Sources

References to browser and deployment documentation.

This assessment is part of the Own the Browser project.